Skip to content

DAOS-19084 test: Suppress Cgo syscall false positives#18448

Open
kjacque wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
kjacque/even-more-cgo-suppressions
Open

DAOS-19084 test: Suppress Cgo syscall false positives#18448
kjacque wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
kjacque/even-more-cgo-suppressions

Conversation

@kjacque
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kjacque kjacque commented Jun 5, 2026

The syscall function signature changed, so suppressions needed to be updated. Also added a suppression related to an internal runtime context.Context implementation.

Steps for the author:

  • Commit message follows the guidelines.
  • Appropriate Features or Test-tag pragmas were used.
  • Appropriate Functional Test Stages were run.
  • At least two positive code reviews including at least one code owner from each category referenced in the PR.
  • Testing is complete. If necessary, forced-landing label added and a reason added in a comment.

After all prior steps are complete:

  • Gatekeeper requested (daos-gatekeeper added as a reviewer).

The syscall function signature changed, so suppressions needed
to be updated. Also added a suppression related to an internal
runtime context.Context implementation.

Signed-off-by: Kris Jacque <kris.jacque@hpe.com>
@kjacque kjacque self-assigned this Jun 5, 2026
@kjacque kjacque requested review from a team as code owners June 5, 2026 15:45
@kjacque kjacque requested review from a team, mjmac and tanabarr June 5, 2026 15:45
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Ticket title is 'NLT Valgrind memcheck error: Syscall param write(buf) points to unaddressable byte(s)'
Status is 'In Review'
https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-19084

@tanabarr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tanabarr commented Jun 6, 2026

no go-related NLT failures, NLT failing on crt_iv_update_internal() ivo_on_update failed: DER_CONT_NONEXIST(-2050): 'The specified container does not exist' warning in strict mode
requesting forced landing

@tanabarr tanabarr requested a review from a team June 6, 2026 23:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants